The only thing I'm certain about regarding this post is that we do not have the whole story. Kudos to the Daily Journal for running with what they did know yesterday about the potential strike over "free speech" issues among City employees. The DJ piece starts with
The union representing 130 Burlingame city workers could strike after complaints allege city managers in various departments are interfering with employees’ rights to free speech. Rod Palmquist, spokesperson for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 829, said the city workers have a right to free speech and express their desire for better-paying wages.
The bit of background we do have is
The state’s Public Employment Relations Board issued an unfair labor practice complaint against the city Sept. 8. In early June, several employees attended a City Council meeting to speak in favor of fair wages. The next day, an employee at the meeting allegedly asked police Capt. Robert Boll a routine operational question. Boll allegedly said, “Why don’t you ask the AFSCME people.” While speaking to a group of employees who voiced the need for a pay increase, Park Superintendent Richard Holtz allegedly responded that they should talk with him if they didn’t like working for the city for the pay they receive, adding he would help them find another place to work, according to a PERB complaint.
First, one could ask why there is such a thing as a Public Employment Relations Board, who is on it and how much homework do they do before they issue a complaint? I'd like to know what the "routine operational question" was and whether it was asked in good faith. As far as the second comment by Rich Holtz, that sounds like him exercising his free speech, not interfering with someone else's. And it's not like he gets to decide who gets paid what in town. For me the kicker is this bit
City employee Joleen Helley said the city pays 6% less than neighboring cities doing similar jobs, according to the release.
Blanket statistics like that always concern me. There are so many variables that boiling a pay comparison down to a single number is impossible. What about time in grade (seniority), performance reviews, benefit packages and the like? B'game is in contract negotiations now--did the other cities just finish theirs so raises come at different times? And the BIg Question is who cares what other cities are paying? That is a false comparison meant to continue a faster upward spiral than is needed to provide the services. I recall back in the day, a clerical job opening at City Hall drew more than 200 applicants. The pay must have been competitive enough.
This is just a place marker post for when we know more--if we ever do.
Recent Comments