Last night's Zoom Townhall on the Police Department's "Use of Force" policies, its track record and its responses to residents' concerns was somewhat enlightening. But not in the way you might have expected. If you were expecting to learn that this is an actual problem in B'game and that major changes are needed, you were disappointed. It's not and they aren't. But if you wanted to see how much some people need to learn about how the City is organized, how it operates, or how it interoperates with the County and other entities then this was the place to be.
First, what has been the extent of Use of Force in B'game? Chief Mike Matteucci saved the statistics until near the end. I was writing as fast as I could but missed a couple of numbers that I will add when the recording becomes available. From 2016 to present there have been 2,643 arrests in B'game. I missed the 2019 figure for uses of force, but all the other years totaled 35 and I believe all but 3 were "empty handed" use of force. Tasers accounted for 3 in five years, if I heard right. Hospitalizations totaled....zero, except for a few officers. After the Chief noted that BPD policy doesn't allow choke holds and now "carotid holds" are newly off the table, the elephant in the room is how exactly empty-hand force will work? Only my first two questions in the post below were addressed, but I am really anxious to get the answer to the fourth question. I wrestled in high school and a bit in college. I know what a challenge it is to just get a guy down on a mat who weighs exactly the same as me; with both of us wearing tights and a referee to prevent eye-gouging, head slaps, etc. It ain't easy.
The Q&A took up about an hour of the 90 minutes. Attendees were informed that the City doesn't have mental health professionals (it's a County function and BPD works with them if they have advance notice), the Taser policy is one-time-only except in rare cases where a second might be needed, and MOST IMPORTANTLY that there is NO SUCH THING as routine call or routine stop. City manager Lisa Goldman's shining moment in an overall excellent performance last night was when she pushed back completely on the idea of some officers going unarmed. Thinly-veiled, leading questions about the use of a private company (Lexipol) for legal updates, officer "impunity" (it's qualified immunity), and the police unions were deftly handled by the Chief and the City attorney Kathleen Kane.
There was more on the education front and I'll link to the recording when it comes out. This webinar was billed as the first step with more to come, but I really don't see why we should bother. Maybe provide written or video'ed answers to the rest of questions in the hopper and let staff get back to work. I took this photo during the Avenue shut-down for potential rioting and I like its nuanced message.

Recent Comments