City Hall Moving Around the Corner?

We covered the shortcomings of the historic City Hall here last September when the search for alternatives started.  As we noted then, a central downtown location is an intangible that is hard to value and harder to replace. Right on cue, staff is recommending a move around the corner to 1440 Chapin Ave--across the street from Mollie Stone's.  The move would involve two phases--a leased period followed by a purchase of the building and inheriting some of the existing tenants.  Per the Staff Report

Pursuant to the Lease and Purchase Agreements, the City is required to purchase the building by June 30, 2027, for a price of $34,500,000. After the building is purchased, the City plans to retain existing tenants in office suites not occupied by the City, which will serve as a source of revenue for the City and offset some or all of the costs associated with purchasing 1440 Chapin. Revenue is estimated to be $1,656,000 per year from rental income.

The city as a landlord could also extend to "the opportunity to collaborate with other public agencies, if they would like to lease space in the new City Hall."  The plan is up for discussion at tomorrow night's city council meeting and as these things go, I would think the deal is basically done.  Enough ground has been laid and there are enough short-tenured councilmembers that staff's say-so will suffice.  We don't have a Rosalie O'Mahony to issue a caution that would prevail.

The real question is what of the current City Hall property?  The DJ piece raised the question, but the answer is "we'll figure that out later"

Nearly 10 years ago, Burlingame had weighed the possibility of developing housing at the current City Hall site, though (Mayor Peter) Stevenson said conversation around the fate of the old building would be held at a future date.

Engaged locals are already worried about the open space in front of city hall.  The holiday tree lighting is a classic B'game community event.  The pressure to flip it to a developer who would "stack and pack" it with a mix of "affordable housing" will be high.  Is there enough backbone to resist it and make the best use of the aging facility possible?  Are there potential tenants who don't need Class A space?  What about those "other public agencies"?  There is also a decent amount of parking on the site so if a Return to Office move is afoot for city staff, those spaces are a short, healthy walk to 1440 Chapin.  We shall see.  An eagle-eyed reader sent me the Instagram post about tomorrow's meeting.  I didn't know the city was posting there.

 

Comments

[Mom]

I hope we don't end up with another lousy Crestmoor deal right downtown. The city should not be in the rental or developer business. Stick to the knitting please.

[Deep Throat- Follow the "lost" $40 Million]

Crestmoor deal..

Deep Throat would state, "Follow the Money.

The SMUHSD's $125 million deal with DR Horton was "cancelled" in July (not August) 2021.

(This period is shady- SMUHSD Board President Robert Griffin is an enabler and there is nothing published on the "deal" in this time.)

The $85 million deal SummerHill Homes was disclosed on August 26, 2021

As the deal came to escrow, SummerHill then SOLD the Crestmoor property to Toll Brothers (sale upon escrow) for an "undisclosed amount. (more than $85 million)

A junior reporter could find the property transfer from SummerHill to Toll Brothers and find out "just how much" Summerhill Homes made for NEVER BUILDING A SINGLE HOME!

What is the amount of a "finders fee" would be paid to DR Horton to cancel the $125 million deal once it was known the SMUHSD was both desperate and crooked?

DCG Strategies Company received a $1.3 million payout for selling Crestmoor at a $40 million discount. Who else "got paid"?

Deep Throat says... "follow the money"

July -August 2021 are the months of scandal in the SMUHSD-

[Joanne Bennett]

They need to keep the land the current city hall sits on and rebuild/remodel. Once that land is gone they will never ever be able to replace it. The City of San Mateo once had their city hall downtown. The only building that exist from the original civic center is the old firehouse on Ellsworth. Several years ago there was some talk about bringing city hall back to downtown. That idea quickly fell flat. A 1960’s apartment building, Mills Square Apts. sits in its place. Burlingame is building plenty of housing all over the place. Preserve that land!

[Timothy Hooker]

Interesting building. Have clients in that building. How many parking spaces?

[Joe]

It's a done deal as predicted. The city newsletter didn't mention if it was unanimous or not. I did a quick walk through the garage space. There are 33 spots at ground level and notably more in the below ground level. I'd estimate 75 total. Here's the official word:

At the City Council meeting on February 18, 2025, the City Council authorized the City Manager to negotiate and execute a Lease Agreement, Purchase and Sale Agreement, and Tenant Improvement Agreement for 1440 Chapin Avenue to serve as the new City Hall. These agreements are subject to additional due diligence.

After execution of the agreements, the City will begin tenant improvements on the space and will not move into 1440 Chapin until at least August 1, 2026. The City will then lease 26,522 square feet of the building before purchasing the building on or before June 30, 2027, for a price of $34,500,000.

The new City Hall is less than two blocks from the current City Hall and will provide ample office space for the City's current staffing levels, as well as room for expansion. Additionally, once the City completes the purchase of the building, the City will receive rent revenue from existing tenants. The new City Hall will include a one-stop-shop service counter, where residents can apply for permits, pay fees, and talk to staff from multiple departments. Residents and business community members will have access to additional parking spaces when visiting the new City Hall, which is also in walking distance to Caltrain and multiple SamTrans routes.

[resident]

The Daily Journal says it was unanimous.

[Handle Bard]

Of course it was.

[Timothy Hooker]

Thanks Joe....

[Katherine Gerster]

I strongly agree with Joanne Bennet’s comment above - thank you, Joanne! It would be so much better for the community if the current site were kept and a new building was erected there.

Obviously the expense would be much greater, but a city hall is such a crucial building - the location and the architecture set the tone for the whole community. Look at Redwood City - its city hall is arguably its most beautiful and architecturally significant building. Just a few years ago, we supported a new, beautiful community center, and I think we could muster similar enthusiasm and support for a city hall we could proud of.

I’ve spent a lot of time in 1440 Chapin (Pure Barre member here) and I’m so disappointed by the idea of that building housing city hall. While it’s near the downtown, the location is awkward and inconvenient, there’s no green space, and frankly, it’s just a random ugly office building. Burlingame is better than that, and we can do better than that!