« Scenes of destruction from LA | Main | Friends with 3 million e-Benefits »

January 16, 2025

Comments

Joe

Holly Rusch at the DJ has assembled all of the numbers and history regarding the B'way rail crossing. Bottom Line? Just as I have written above.
 

Though it had been slow going at times — “why does it take from 2017 to almost 24 … to implement the design that the whole city agreed upon?” Colson said: $17 million had been committed from Burlingame, $24 million secured in county transportation sales tax money, $133 million in potential county sales tax funding and $85 million in hard-fought state funding had been promised for the future.
-----------
Regarding Caltrain adding AI, new gates and signage
-------------------

While Burlingame is grateful for such additions, it doesn’t change the need for a grade separation, Goldman said.

“You have to get the cars and the trucks and the bikes and the people ... off the path of where the train is traveling,” she said. “You can’t paint your way out of it or signalize your way out of it. That certainly helps. It’ll help a lot. But the most important thing is to separate the roadway from the railway.”

https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/1965-to-now-decades-add-huge-cost-to-rail-project-in-burlingame/article_625ffe42-e5d0-11ef-9e42-67dc1fb6912a.html?utm_source=smdailyjournal.com&utm_campaign=%2Fnewsletters%2Fheadlines%2F%3F-dc%3D1739199633&utm_medium=email&utm_content=headline

Peter Garrison

Build the parts off site in Brisbane. Heavy lift helicopters and fit them together like a jigsaw puzzle.

Ask, “What would China or Elon do?” And get it done.

Jennifer Pfaff

The Boring Company- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGZFBETuHqk

Joe

The DJ basically repeated the article from last month, but with a very pointed quote from our mayor to spice things up a bit!:


The increase is due to a variety of factors, a large one being Caltrain’s inaccurate 2022 estimate, which was derived primarily from design, not construction, consultants. The cost has also increased due to the need to work around live electrified infrastructure, which was fully implemented in September 2024.

“That’s a $300 million scholarship to educate Caltrain on modern construction theory and planning,” Burlingame Mayor Peter Stevenson said. “They didn’t have the expertise to do this ... we told them to do this project before electrification because electrification adds time and cost, so the reality is, we don’t have confidence in that relationship structure.”

Timothy Hooker

Cost overruns article: https://www.propelleraero.com/blog/10-construction-project-cost-overrun-statistics-you-need-to-hear/

Joe

That is quite an indictment of project planning and execution! From the site:

Recent studies have found that, on average, nationwide construction projects exceed their budget by 16% at minimum—and often far more. Many lenders recommend including a 20% contingency right off the bat for cost overrun. Imagine a 20% salary increase, and you’ll have a good idea of what a significant expansion this is! And remember, this is an average across all projects, not a one-time overrun.

---------------------
High-speed rail will set a new, all time high benchmark----it could end up somewhere like 2,0000% over.

Joe

B'game is going back to the drawing board with a new $3.8M Sharpie. From the DJ:


City staff worked with the project’s partners, including Caltrain and the San Mateo County Transportation Authority, to get pricing for the redesign from $19.9 million to $15.3 million, $3.8 million of which will come from the city. The reduction reflects a $1 million decrease in the design fee and a $700,000 reduction in Caltrain’s costs.

----this paragraph doesn't make mathematical sense, but it doesn't matter right now---

There’s currently a $586 million funding gap on the project. If all the funding the city is lobbying for comes through — including $15 million from Burlingame, $280 million from the San Mateo County Transportation Authority, $110 million in state funding, as well as federal funding — that still leaves a gap of around $147 million.

In regards to the redesign, the city is putting barriers in place to ensure they aren’t financially blindsided again, Public Works Director Syed Murtuza said, including searching for an outside resource to peer-review Caltrain’s design estimations. Brownrigg seconded a desire to see new protocol for the design effort.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

About the Voice

  • The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community. Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California. On it you can read and comment on important city issues.

    Note: Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice Blog are those of the poster and not necessarily the opinion of the editorial board of the Burlingame Voice. See Terms of Use

Contributing to the Voice

  • If you would like more information on the Burlingame Voice, send an email to [email protected] with your request or question. We appreciate your interest.

    Authors may login here.

    For help posting to the Voice, see our tutorial.