« Free Lunch: CSM pushes "free college" | Main | Sloppy floppy signage »

November 25, 2024

Comments

Joe

Oh boy! Talk about not reading the room. Check this bit of news from yesterday from today's DJ:


As a way to “streamline information” for residents about “updates that impact them most” from the Sheriff’s Office, Corpus announced Nov. 25 she will be launching a quarterly newsletter that “allows residents to get important information directly from us.”

“I believe that maintaining lines of communication between the community and our office will help us build greater trust, inclusion and collaboration as we work harder and smarter to fight crime,” Corpus wrote in the inaugural newsletter.

The first edition of the newsletter made no mention of the ongoing outcries of concern over the state of the Sheriff’s Office, but included staff’s access to a 24/7 therapist as a wellness initiative, an autism awareness training conducted in July, and other community programs implemented earlier this year.
---------------------------
What the over/under on how many issues of the newsletter will ever be published? I'm going with 5.

Joe

The soap opera continues with San Carlos weighing in--and some astounding numbers about resignations in the department. From the DJ:

The first city to weigh in on the Sheriff’s Office scandal, the San Carlos City Council at its Nov. 25 meeting unanimously passed a resolution of no confidence in Sheriff Christina Corpus and called for her immediate resignation.

As one of three cities in the county to contract services with the Sheriff’s Office, San Carlos weighed in on what Mayor John Dugan described as “nothing less than a full spectrum failure of leadership.”

Since Corpus entered office, at least 106 sworn staff left the agency, and only approximately half of those were retirement eligible.
--------------------
And a regular recall effort is kicking off with Harnett and Mueller raising money and volunteers.

Joe

Game on. March 4th is the election date for the temporary Charter Amendment that would allow 4 out of 5 Supes to dump the sheriff. The DJ has some details today:

The second reading (Ed: at yesterday's Supe meeting) of an ordinance similar to this one would usually be approved through the consent agenda, Supervisor Noelia Corzo said, but was placed as a discussion item out of consideration of the public. Many residents have raised concern over the quickness taken in placing the ordinance on the ballot.
-------------------
Gotta love that "many residents" bit. How many is "many"? And how many of them were part of "Wreckin' San Mateo"?
-------------------
Corzo said she had a conversation with the sheriff earlier this year when Corpus admitted Victor Aenlle — who is at the core of the allegations investigated by Cordell — had lied to Corzo about something Corpus allegedly had said.

However, the Board of Supervisors also approved formally asking Corpus to attend the board meeting Dec. 10, and provide sworn testimony in an effort to grant the sheriff the ability to respond to the allegations. The board has until Dec. 11 to remove the measure from the ballot.
--------------------------
The operative word here is "Sworn" testimony. The adjacent operative word is "Perjury".
--------------------------
With the passing of the ordinance to be placed on the March ballot, members of the county — including the board and the sheriff — will be barred from using county resources for campaigning.
--------------------------
I guess it's a sign of the times--and the soap opera--that this even needed to be said.

Joe

It's Monday so Dave Price at the Daily Post publishes his editorial for the week, and Oh Boy. Headline:

Don't Give Corpus a Golden Parachute

He put the Supervisors on notice that taxpayers will not look kindly on a pay-to-go-out-the-door deal. His radar says it's being "considered". My favorite part is:

SHE'S LAWYERED UP

"Corpus has hired a couple of lawyers, and they may be telling her that any public statements she gives can and will be used against her in a FUTURE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION."

I added the CAPS there at the end. Price goes into a couple possible criminal charges. He doesn't say it explicitly, but if the Supes think they have prosecutable stuff, do not pop the parachute for her.

The Cordell report just keeps giving details. Per Price's piece "He (Aenlle) gave her (Corpus) $11,000 diamond Tiffany earring and $1,200 red-bottomed Christian Louboutin boots, according to the report."
---------
As a little sweet bite at the end, Price reminds us that we had a sheriff trainee deputy leave her gun behind at Crepevine in B'game recently. I wouldn't pin that on the sheriff necessarily, but it supports the basic jist of "it's time to go".

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

About the Voice

  • The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community. Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California. On it you can read and comment on important city issues.

    Note: Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice Blog are those of the poster and not necessarily the opinion of the editorial board of the Burlingame Voice. See Terms of Use

Contributing to the Voice

  • If you would like more information on the Burlingame Voice, send an email to [email protected] with your request or question. We appreciate your interest.

    Authors may login here.

    For help posting to the Voice, see our tutorial.