« PSA: Elder abuse in the County | Main | Stinky Red Tide in B'game »

August 27, 2022

Comments

Joe

This is what I'm talking about--"confusion" about historic status, difficulty in getting it at a level that a Planning Commission or City Council will agree with.........

https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/historic-buildings-at-issue-in-lot-split-talks-in-san-mateo/article_a5188af8-25b9-11ed-be0d-47b8c63f54d5.html?utm_source=smdailyjournal.com&utm_campaign=%2Fnewsletters%2Fheadlines%2F%3F-dc%3D1661608818&utm_medium=email&utm_content=headline

The (San Mateo) Planning Commission was concerned that eligible historical buildings were included in the ordinance instead of just approved ones, citing potential misappropriation to prevent SB 9 developments. SB 9 does not apply to historic properties and could be used to ensure specific historical neighborhoods remain the same. The ordinance addresses different historic property preservation definitions in the city’s municipal code and the general plan, leading to confusion in past development proposals. Under the ordinance, historic buildings are eligible on the National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historical Resources, the Downtown Historic District contributor buildings, or documented in a historic resources report. The municipal code did not include provisions for buildings identified through a historic resources report. While the city determines eligibility, it is creating guidelines so outside consultants can produce their documents to be peer-reviewed by staff.

Commissioner Seema Patel said it could lead to someone obtaining a historical report from anyone that prevents a property owner from using SB 9.
-----
Hat-tip to Santayana: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to scrape it.”

Rob

Great article. Our house was built in 1904, making it a rare pre-quake home and the earliest on our block from the research we have done.On 3 occasions a former resident stopped by to say hello. I was at work all three times, but my wife and daughter gleaned some good information. The most interesting was the former owner and retired Pan Am mechanic who lived here in the mid 1950's to 1970's. He was one of few who lived in this neighborhood when a working person could afford to live here. The window at the top of our garage is from an old DC-3! We have loved this house for 28 years and are proud to be part of its history.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

About the Voice

  • The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community. Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California. On it you can read and comment on important city issues.

    Note: Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice Blog are those of the poster and not necessarily the opinion of the editorial board of the Burlingame Voice. See Terms of Use

Contributing to the Voice

  • If you would like more information on the Burlingame Voice, send an email to editor@burlingamevoice.com with your request or question. We appreciate your interest.

    Authors may login here.

    For help posting to the Voice, see our tutorial.