This is a tough post for me to write. That's why it has taken me two weeks to write it since the Caltrans virtual meeting about the El Camino Real Roadway Renewal project on July 14th. I really want to see some things fixed on ECR as noted here, here here and here. But sometimes the cure can be worse than the illness and from what I heard, this is one of those times. The virtual meeting had numerous presenters each with their own piece of the project, but the overarching view was obscured by bureaucracy and over-regulation along with some over-engineering. We heard about this "once in a generation project" which is an understatement--a generation is 20-30 years--and while the project may take half of that to complete (certainly more than the 2 years stated), we will be living with the results for much longer---if it happens.
Caltrans presented three options: the No Build alternative, the Roadway rehab without undergrounding the utilities and the Roadway rehab with undergrounding. At least the horrendous "road diet" option reducing regular users to one lane in each direction with a center turn lane and all sorts of other goodies for people who don't actually drive on ECR is "not viable". The good news ends there, because once the anti-eucalyptus forces start drooling over the two Roadway rehab options, we are headed for a dramatic changes that will take years to recover. PG&E and the city council want the utilities underground. I'm still not sure why when you consider the historic, nationally-registered eucalyptus grove will be a casualty of that move. The renderings of what a denuded ECR would look like were all "20 years post-build" and even after 20 years still looked like a sad shell of the canopy we have now. One astute questioner noted that they drive south on ECR every weekday morning and there are several months of the year when the sun is directly in the eyes of drivers. Only the towering eucs make for a partial sun shield that surely makes for safer driving and pedestrian crossings. Been there, experienced that. And it's not just sun blindness--remember this incident?
Given how long it took to take out just one eucalyptus at Howard Ave. a couple years ago (about a week), we could be faced with a year or more of horrific traffic closures as there are 390 of them in the tree rows. The claim is that only 3% of them are in "good condition". And yet they go on year after year with minimal incidents. It seems like selective replacement as we have been doing is better than a wholesale removal and replacement with 7 to 14' trees.
As for the rough sidewalks pushed up by tree roots, one of the Caltrans personnel finally said what I have been thinking for years-- why not just "bridge over slightly raised roots". It is apparently allowed and would work in the places that are not too bad. Throw in some serious digging at the 4 or 5 known flooding areas to clear roots and debris and rebuild the drains and you have what I would call a "Light Build alternative". Public comment can be made at www.ElCaminoRealProject.com until next Monday, August 2nd. I'm not sure it will do much good at this point, but a light build is all we need.
Recent Comments