« Caltrain: DiFi Gets an Education | Main | Collector Extraordinaire »

April 01, 2017

Comments

hollyroller@gmail.com

Vulgar post deleted.

hollyroller@gmail.com

Sorry..

hillsider

About time.

Hollyroller@gmail.com

Oh Hillsider....
You Rascal.

Joe

A bit of insight from the California Policy Center and the Bee:

The governor noted that, yes, roads cost money and compared it to ignoring a leaky roof on one’s house – it gets worse if you ignore it. True, but Brown does the same dance each year. He introduces a budget that dramatically underfunds transportation, then holds it hostage to a tax hike. He continues to raise salaries for public employees, which also raises those pension contributions, but he won’t deal with roads and bridges without a tax. And he won’t deal with pension costs and other major problems that would free up money for roads.

And he won’t reform the way Caltrans currently is spending its money. The Legislative Analyst’s Office in 2014 noted that Caltrans is “overstaffed by about 3,500 full-time equivalents beginning in 2014-15 at a cost of more than $500 million.” The Sacramento Bee’s Dan Walters put it more directly when he referred to union “featherbedding” at the agency.

Joe

Today's news has the payback for responsible voting:

Sen. Steve Glazer, the East Bay Democrat who broke from his party last month to vote against increased transportation taxes — which narrowly passed by a two-thirds vote — is now paying the price.

He announced on Twitter Friday afternoon that he had agreed to resign his post as chairman of the Senate Governmental Organization Committee, effective immediately, as requested by Senate leader Kevin de León, D-Los Angeles.

After the bill passed without Glazer’s support, the senator released a statement saying his constituents were against a tax increase and that he felt the measure should have provided better spending priorities and more assurances to taxpayers that the money would be well spent.

“My constituents have told me loud and clear that they want any new taxes to be spent more wisely and effectively,” he wrote. “For instance, it doesn’t make sense to spend billions of dollars on an unpopular High Speed Rail system that backers claim might be completed by 2029 when it could go for transportation improvements today.”

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

About the Voice

  • The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community. Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California. On it you can read and comment on important city issues.

    Note: Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice Blog are those of the poster and not necessarily the opinion of the editorial board of the Burlingame Voice. See Terms of Use

Contributing to the Voice

  • If you would like more information on the Burlingame Voice, send an email to [email protected] with your request or question. We appreciate your interest.

    Authors may login here.

    For help posting to the Voice, see our tutorial.