For the last post of the year, let's return to high-speed rail where the news is mixed. On Monday the Daily Post ran a piece about Kevin Mullin authoring Assembly Bill 1889 to "alter the original ballot measure" that got our high-cost rail boondoggle started. Wonder why it needs altering? The piece notes that the original authorization listed the boondoggle at $33 billion and it is now projected to cost $64 billion. Of course, the only people who think it could come in under $100 billion are the people who would be in line to get the $100 billion. Here is my favorite provision of Mullin's bill
One (funding plan) provides for building a 119-mile test track from Madera to Shafter for $7.8 billion. After the testing is completed, the rail authority said in its funding plan that it would explore other uses for the track, though they would not immediately include high-speed trains.
I've got an idea for another use to explore. How about a remake of the Rockie and Bullwinkle Show with Kevin playing the part of Snidely Whiplash? I think the bill is numbered appropriately. It would have to be 1889 with robber barons everywhere for this railroad to make any sense.
I said the news was mixed so here is the good news part. With Elaine Chao as incoming Transportation Secretary and California Rep. Kevin McCarthy as House Speaker, federal bucks for high-cost rail in California will be about as likely as a 10 year rainstorm. McCarthy is fond of using the "boondoggle" term that originated here in B'game in reference to Gov. Brown's train fantasy. Sounds like the makings of a Happy New Year to me.
Recent Comments