The Daily Post has an above-the-fold piece on Mike Scanlon's replacement at SamTrans. We won't find out who or how much until the Board approves the offer and (I assume) the candidate accepts it. That's fair enough since whoever it is wouldn't want his or her current employer knowing of their job search.
The question is will the offer be higher or lower than Mr. Scanlon's $419,492 per year which the Post notes is "more than twice the $165,288 Gov. Jerry Brown is paid"? Given how crucial the SamTrans chief exec is to High-cost Rail since he or she also runs Caltrain and the SM County Transportation Authority, Jerry may actually think that is OK!
CC-HSR put out this upbeat e-mail yesterday:
The Atherton Environmental Lawsuit
The Town of Atherton, also a long time opponent of the destructive High-Speed Rail project proposed for the Peninsula, has filed a formal challenge to the EIR certified by Caltrain in January. The proposed Caltrain project is a stalking horse for High-Speed Rail, and violates the California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA, the state's most important environmental law. CC-HSR has joined Atherton in this lawsuit. All we are trying to do is make sure that Caltrain complies with the law so that residents of the Peninsula are adequately protected. This is an important weapon in our effort to keep a destructive HSR project OFF the Peninsula.
Upcoming Peninsula Proposition 1A Lawsuit
Within a matter of weeks, we anticipate the filing of a major lawsuit against the Authority for its violation of Proposition 1A with respect to the Peninsula project. CC-HSR is planning to be a party to that lawsuit, and we expect others to join with us. Multiple new violations of Proposition 1A exist, and this lawsuit will be a powerful weapon to ensure that the strict requirements of Proposition 1A are observed, and that High-Speed Rail does not violate the integrity of our lovely residential districts, and our vibrant business centers.
Good luck and Godspeed.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/articles/lnews/2015-03-12/new-transit-chief-named-former-redwood-city-mayor-to-make-434k-to-lead-caltrain-samtrans-transportation-authority/1776425139888.html
Posted by: Jennifer | March 12, 2015 at 10:17 AM
I guess I nailed that one if I do say so myself: "Given how crucial the SamTrans chief exec is to High-cost Rail since he or she also runs Caltrain and the SM County Transportation Authority, Jerry may actually think that (fat paycheck) is OK!"
So of all the experienced railroad/bus line execs in the country we get a politician and high-cost rail board member for $15K more per year. Not a bad pay package for running a 77 miles train and a decent sized bus system.
Posted by: Joe | March 12, 2015 at 06:27 PM
I have been getting many emails regarding the new hire to head up Caltrain/Samtrans. They have all been consistent in their sentiment. Some have used the words "outrageous" or "cronyism."
Dave Price of the Daily Post in his editorial yesterday is quite clear that he too feels the outrage of replacing one very highly paid CEO with one with an even higher salary who hasn't yet proven he can do the job. As the Post is not online, here are some key quotes, some paraphrased:
"Any chance on passing a tax to improve Caltrain is now dead. The transit board killed any hope of passing such a tax when it hired Hartnett at a staggering $434,661 per year." ( Hartnett's salary will be higher than his predecessor, $419,492.)
Price goes on to question Hartnett's qualifications, the hiring process and his marriage to a board member of the San Mateo County Transit Authority which awards transit tax dollars to agency like Caltrain and Samtrans.
Price also points out an irony, ( one that I have always thought about) and that's the fact that Hartnett, like Mike Scanlon before him, gets a car to use on the job. Price and I think if you work for a transit agency you ought to use it to get to work.
This hire, in my opinion, is government at its worst. Nothing against Hartnett necessarily, but I'm a process guy and it is clear the process is broken. While I can't fix the process, I can, like Price, attempt to shine some more light on a process that has been cloaked in darkness.
Posted by: Russ | March 17, 2015 at 09:39 AM
....it's no secret that the pockets of wealth, are in a politician's pants...
Posted by: theFly | March 17, 2015 at 10:45 PM
Far more important than salary is what improvements Mr Hartnett will make to the county's transit systems. In his previous stint, he tried to ban bikes from Caltrain entirely, but now the system can barely keep up with demand from riders who need bikes to make last-mile connections. Will we see more Caltrain service at Broadway station? More frequent bus service on the ECR and 292 routes? More frequent BART service? These would all make commuting to and from Burlingame a lot easier, and I'm eager to see if Mr Hartnett is interested in any of them.
Posted by: Teapot | March 18, 2015 at 06:59 PM
Paying that type of salary to a government employee is disgusting. That should be prominently pointed out every time and at every opportunity when the government brings any bond or tax measure up for vote.
Posted by: Steve K | March 20, 2015 at 05:35 AM
Steve,
The people behind high speed rail are more than disgusting...they are more like the smell of a rotting, dead animal in the hot sun.
Why?
Because their team just keeps delivering people that not only break the law, but who also do so with great contempt for the rule of law.
The people of California voted in the high speed rail with very specific conditions - and yet the-end-justifies-the-means HSR management just flips the bird to the voters and ignores the laws instead.
Do you like and benefit from the rule of law in The United States, or should we go back to having kings and queens rule and thus do whatever they want at their whim? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lDN5b6ET0I&sns=em
Posted by: If HSR management and their team can ignore the laws, why don't we all? | March 21, 2015 at 02:11 PM