« Controller Battle: Joe v. Juan | Main | Electoral IQ Test »

May 17, 2014



Dan Walters does watch things and call a fair game. Today he lets readers know

The point is that changing any game’s rules also affects the game’s outcomes. And that’s very true of politics, which brings us to two big political process changes being proposed by Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg.

Both proposals respond to recent events, but their effect – intended or otherwise – would be to solidify Democrats’ already overwhelming control of the Legislature.

Last year, Michael Rubio, a Democratic senator from Bakersfield, resigned unexpectedly to become a corporate executive, and Republican Andy Vidak captured the seat in a special election. Losing the seat embarrassed Steinberg and also reduced the “supermajority” that Democrats had won in the Senate just a few months earlier.

Steinberg’s Senate Constitutional Amendment 16, if approved by the Legislature and voters, would allow the governor to fill a legislative vacancy, with agreement of the involved house, and require that the replacement come from the same party as the predecessor.

Steinberg says it would reduce expensive special elections and provide more continuity of representation. But it would also protect Democrats from losing seats in low-turnout special elections, while giving them the indirect power to fill GOP vacancies.

Steinberg’s final year in office has been marred by three Democratic colleagues being suspended while facing criminal charges.

The Senate suspended the three even though the state constitution doesn’t contain any provision for suspension, just expulsion by a two-thirds vote.

Senate Constitutional Amendment 17 would allow a legislator to be suspended without pay for any reason by a majority house vote – thus giving the majority party, virtually always Democrats, immense new power.

Perhaps it wouldn’t be misused to punish, or threaten to punish, a recalcitrant legislator for purely political reasons, but who really knows? History indicates that once acquired, political power is almost always used.

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2014/05/18/6413444/dan-walters-when-political-rules.html#storylink=cpy

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

About the Voice

  • The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community. Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California. On it you can read and comment on important city issues.

    Note: Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice Blog are those of the poster and not necessarily the opinion of the editorial board of the Burlingame Voice. See Terms of Use

Contributing to the Voice

  • If you would like more information on the Burlingame Voice, send an email to editor@burlingamevoice.com with your request or question. We appreciate your interest.

    Authors may login here.

    For help posting to the Voice, see our tutorial.