My weekend was consumed with Spring cleaning including refreshing my earthquake preparedness kit. I hadn't looked in there since it was assembled as a project for one kid in elementary school! Here's the State's checklist that I've been working off of. Several recent newspaper articles and the Japan quake got me motivated and gallons of bottled water are on sale for $1 this week.
But relaxing at the end of the day with this week's edition of The Economist brought high-cost rail right back into focus. Near the end of a piece called The Curse of Complacency about quake prep, they write:
One of the NRC's most important (and certainly most expensive) recommendations is a national earthquake warning system like the one Japan installed in 2007. Thanks to its network of 1,000 seismic stations around the country, Japanese authorities had enarly a minute to halt bullet trains in northern Japan (none was derailed) and warn local employers to stop lifts and switch off dangerous machinery. The seismographs detect the burst of "p-waves" emitted by an earthquake that travel at twice the speed of the most destructive "s-waves", giving valuable seconds of warning depending on the distance from the epicenter.
But seismologists fear a national earthquake warning system is unlikely to be built in America because of complacency and the spending squeeze. Finding just the $50m needed to complete California's pilot network is proving hard enough--and Californians need no reminding how valuable such a system would be.
Then this morning KQED runs a segment that says essentially the same thing but notes that 400 sensing stations are already in place in California and pegging the cost to complete the system at $80 million. So the question of the week: How is it that we have $66 billion to build high-cost rail, but we can't find $50-80 million to ensure it and all sorts of other activities like surgeries, riding elevators or sitting in classrooms of old school buildings are safer? Just askin'.
Recent Comments