The Daily News has another front page story today titled "Two Safeways, one remodel" by Liz Harrelson. The story contrasts the Burlingame experience with that of Menlo Park where a similarly outdated Safeway is scheduled for remodelling. The classic Safeway quote from Safeway PR person Jennifer Webber is "In Menlo Park the neighbors were willing to listen to our parameters about the site, and in turn we listened to them as well."
Of course, the story doesn't identify
even one change made by Safeway in Menlo Park. They are going to get a 65,748-square-foot "hacienda-style" store with an attached 11,500 sq ft retail space. Sounds just like the "fried egg" design (a building in the middle of an ocean of parking) that was canned here in Burlingame. Let's hope Menlo Park doesn't suffer the same fate as Redwood City, but it seems inevitable.
So here's the open forum question for Safeway: What did Safeway change over the last eight years that this has been going on? Answer: there have only been about two years in total when anything was happening at all and the only change is to paste on a couple of small retail spaces on one side of a design that has the exact same
size,
orientation and
access/egress problems it always has had. Ms. Webber should feel free to blog on (or perhaps she already has on some other postings).
Too bad reporter Harrelson didn't mention the real difference between Menlo Park and Burlingame: that in Burlingame there is a public land swap required to create the final parcel.
Safeway reiterated its "we're waiting to see what the community wants" nonsense at the end of the article. No developer anywhere gets this sort of pre-approval, but increasingly it would appear that Safeway is going to sit it out until the next election. Afterall,
in Burlingame that's when we find out what the community really wants.
- Written by anson
Recent Comments