- Written by Fiona
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Burlingame Garden Center | Main | Enguard! »
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community. Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California. On it you can read and comment on important city issues.
Note: Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice Blog are those of the poster and not necessarily the opinion of the editorial board of the Burlingame Voice. See Terms of Use
If you would like more information on the Burlingame Voice, send an email to [email protected] with your request or question. We appreciate your interest.
Authors may login here.
For help posting to the Voice, see our tutorial.
For back issues of the print newsletter see our Print Archives.
Copyright © 1999-2025 The Burlingame Voice
Could it be that this is one of the "sacred cows" they want to protect? I am not really clear how Prop "A" is written or what the money can be spent on. As I was typing this a thought came to mind, is Prop "A" money a random fund or are there specific things the $$$$ needs to be spend on. If is can be used as a sluch fund, the voters might not be in favor to give a blank check to the governing body to do with as they wish. Just a thought!
Posted by: rich grogan | May 22, 2004 at 11:18 PM
"Measure A" money and other similar transportation sales taxes have historically been used for "Capital" Improvement projects (many counties in California have them). And yes, generally the money is allocated to special projects. Many of the improvements on the CalTrain line (grade separations in particular) were paid by Measure A. The money ganted to the cities has historically been given for road resurfacing (a small % of the total raised). Knowing the Burlingame general fund can barely cover 50% of the road resurfacing needs in the city, it is no wonder "The City" is not interested in using the money for crossing guards. Can they do it? Probably. But as much as I want to find money for the crossing guards, I am not sure this is the right place to look for it. Measure A is up for renewal in November, and I do not believe it is polling so well, so Mike Nevin and others are seeking support for the renewal in any way they can.
Posted by: Michael Barber | June 01, 2004 at 05:38 PM