Following Mr. Fuchs' gossip column about the $100,000 political consultant, I faxed him to correct his many errors and requested that he address the substance of the Burlingame Voice posting which he has yet to do.
This is the fax I received from our independent Mr Fuchs today :
"The website I referred to as J. Baylock's compositions are (sic) by-lined Steve. Does that constitute a legitimate byline or is it a joke? Come off it, Fiona - your bias is showing, J. Fuchs"
I have of course written him back explaining that I know "Steve" and believe me he is no Joe Baylock!! Just thought this might amuse everyone who reads Fuchs' column - especially the bias part!
This is the fax I received from our independent Mr Fuchs today :
"The website I referred to as J. Baylock's compositions are (sic) by-lined Steve. Does that constitute a legitimate byline or is it a joke? Come off it, Fiona - your bias is showing, J. Fuchs"
I have of course written him back explaining that I know "Steve" and believe me he is no Joe Baylock!! Just thought this might amuse everyone who reads Fuchs' column - especially the bias part!
- Written by Fiona
What is even more amusing is the issue that Mr. Fuchs raised initially in his article 'A bogus $100,000 accusation' seems to be substantiated. Indeed Mr. McGovern IS a $100k+ consultant.
Oh, poor old Jerry. It ain't like it used to be!!!
Posted by: Jeremy | August 29, 2003 at 04:36 AM
It's pretty clear that Fuchs doesn't understand the concept of blogs and how anyone can post to these threads, even Mr. Fuchs, if he wanted to.
Ignorance is bliss. But then, again, Jerry has never worried about getting his facts straight if it means he has the opportunity to take a cheap shot at someone.
Posted by: grimis | August 31, 2003 at 05:30 PM