The Burlingame Voice

Our Cupola

Let's lighten things up with a couple of normal, pre-COVID style posts.  You may have gotten the freebie magazine Punch - Spirit of the Peninsula in your driveway over the last couple of days.  If so, be sure to read the very last one-page article by our very own author-historian Joanne Garrison.  The mag asked her to explain what can seem like an odd little feature of our downtown parking lot next to Pet Express on Park Rd.  It's the cupola from the original city hall that stood on that site.

Joanne notes the original city hall was designed by Charles Peter Weeks and describes how the late-'60s plan to tear it down in favor of the architecturally-challenged city hall we still have raised preservationists' ire, spawned the Burlingame Historical Society and gave the cupola a home amid the asphalt and parking meters.  Fun story about a fun monument.

Spring Tree Hugger Post

This Spring will go down in memory as one of the most eerie yet beautiful Springs in a long time.  With all of the social distancing happening on the streets and parks there has been plenty of quiet walks that allow for pensive views of our local trees.  I am particularly impressed with the fruitless pear trees (at least that is what I think they are) that are in the median strips.  Apparently there are several types: Cleveland, Aristocrat, Chanticleer, Bradford and who knows how many others.  This one is quite old and very beautiful.

B'game Town Hall - COVID-19 local updates

The City Council and City staff ran an hour-long Zoom webinar tonight to update about 175 residents on the status of various actions to prevent the spread of the new coronavirus.  I thought it was very well done with kudos to the mayor and especially City Manager Lisa Goldman.  The link to the recording is up on the city website here.

If you don't have an hour, here are a few of my takeaways.  The County website SMChealth.org is "information central" for the most current counts of cases and for the status of shelter-in-place restrictions.  It is usually updated mostly in the morning but the FAQs are continuously updated.  The County is taking a number of steps to prepare for the anticipated uptick in cases.  It has rented a number of B'game hotel rooms for non-hospitalization-needed cases; as well as first responders who may not have the ability to do their regular commutes.  The County is also accepting volunteers' contact info and has about 1,000 volunteers already, but there is not yet a clear direction on what they might do.  The same goes for our favorite local preparedness group BNN and its CERT-trained teams.  More info to follow as recommended actions are decided upon.

The County has set up 211 phone service for those that may not know how or where to look on-line.  I have to imagine that is more of a last resort for more complicated questions.

Similarly, if you see things in town that merit some intervention or seem non-essential--like groups of teens congregating in public or gardeners gardening-- you can call the Non-Emergency BPD phone at 650 777-4100.  Officers will educate them and disperse where necessary and they have a flyer to hand out--so you should not do it yourself if you are not comfortable--and who would be?  Note that housing construction and repair has been deemed an "essential service" by the county, so don't call about contractors.

The County has allocated $3M of Measure K funds to "help out" and is soliciting donations to a 501c3 named SMC Strong--more to follow when details emerge but I'm guessing you have several ideas on who needs support directly.  CallPrimrose is accepting monetary donations, but no food, clothing, etc at this time.

Those are my key findings from the one-hour webcast and I believe we will be seeing more of these.  In the future, we need to incorporate slides (graphics/text) so that items like phone numbers and websites don't have to be repeated verbally--people still don't reliably get them that way.  This is standard stuff in the corporate world and can easily scale to meet municipal communication needs.  All in all, good show.  It's worth you going to view it--you probably have the time ;-(

Coping With Quarantine

I really don't want to add to the concerns that people already have about the Covid-19 virus, the actions we all must take or the longer-term effects on society.  But I do think it would be helpful to local businesses if the word got out on what was open, partially open (e.g. take-out only, curbside delivery sorts of things) and any other tips for coping.  So here is sort of an "open thread".  If you have any helpful tips, please feel free to add them.  I wish Safeway had a webcam upfront so I could check the lines before I walk over.  The shortened hours shown below should help the staff keep up.  Molly Stone's was pacing customers' entry yesterday and I have not been up to the North End yet.

High-Cost Rail - Part 150 "Shut-up and play the game"

It's been six months since we posted about the on-going delays and spiraling budget of the high-cost rail system that is burning through roughly $46 million per month in the Central Valley.  Most Bay Area people I speak with think either a) "hasn't this thing been killed already?"or b) "it will never get to the Peninsula" or c) "it will die of its own accord when the money runs out and we'll have an archaeological monument in Fresno".  If you only read the SF Chronicle, then aside from other problems you have, you would think HSR is basically on-track to become a cost-effective commuter line into SF.  They can even get ostensibly legit train people to write editorials to that effect.

So we have to rely on the LA Times for real reporting on what is going on with our money and it ain't pretty.  In a piece this week titled California bullet train officials say they were told to suppress bad news and ‘shut up’ a couple of named whistle blowers and a number of supporting anonymous sources paint a disturbing picture

When Mark Styles was hired in October 2018 to help oversee Central Valley scheduling for the California bullet train, he soon learned he had walked into a mess.  A core problem was the project’s operating culture, in which managers for WSP, the bullet train’s lead consultant, threatened to punish or terminate employees if they failed to toe the company line, Styles said.  “I was told to shut up and not say anything,” said Styles, a career construction manager who was hired as WSP’s senior supervisory scheduler in the project’s Fresno office.

..Other ex-WSP employees in the Fresno office, including engineer Vera Lovejoy and project controls coordinator Todd Bilstein, say they were also discouraged from sharing bad news with bosses.   Bilstein also left in 2019 after a nine-month tenure.  “If I was to give a talk at a construction conference, I would say they were not following generally accepted project management principles,” he said.

Some of the details of the slippages that are going to cost several bundles include

To install track by 2022 would normally require all of the bridges, viaducts, trenches and other structures to be completed beforehand. As a stopgap measure, the rail authority now plans to install track in five-mile discontinuous segments, which the Federal Railroad Administration has criticized as illogical.

Today, the rail authority is short by 497 of the 2,042 parcels it needs, according to its most recent progress report. In December, the authority acquired only five parcels.

But the kicker comes from an anonymous source

“They have all these people in top jobs with no technical background,” said a top executive at a major European engineering firm, who worked on the project. “They are politicians. They never disclose the full cost. They give you incremental truth. They believe that is a successful business model. They should cancel the contracts and start over.”

I'm not sure I agree with the conclusion, but his problem statement sounds accurate.  Imagine if we took a tiny sliver of what we are burning in the Valley and did the ten or fifteen key grade separations on the Peninsula, got the Caltrain electrification back on schedule and upped the frequency of service?  Ah, it's nice to dream small.

Dividing Up B'game's Council

Two and a half years ago we noted the possibility of City Council: Allot Seats by District?.  It looks like that day has arrived courtesy of the same attorney we wrote about back then.  The DJ is reporting

District elections are headed to Burlingame, according to City Manager Lisa Goldman who confirmed officials received a letter threatening to sue for the change if it was not adopted voluntarily.  Before the Burlingame City Council meeting Monday, March 2, officials discussed in closed session the city’s existing election format relative to state voting law, according to the meeting agenda.

Following that discussion, Goldman said officials agreed to move away from the current at-large format and adopt the by-district system during the next Burlingame City Council election.  “Because our next council election is not until 2022, we have time for a robust public process and thorough review of our demographics as we move forward,” said Goldman.

If you go back and read through the whole post from 2 1/2 years ago, you can review the concerns about gerrymandering districts to accomplish.....well, I'm not sure what it is trying to accomplish.  It looks like we will be hiring a demographer to analyze the racial make-up of various neighborhoods and somehow divide up the city accordingly.  I can imagine on one hand this might make it a more open race and cheaper to run in each district.  The costs of signs, direct mail, etc would be less.  But how do you hold debates?  Do we hold five debates--one for each district since candidates from different districts are not running against each other?  If a sitting councilmember moves to another district for some reason--say a renter whose rent goes up--do we have another election?  You can't very well have four councilmembers from the other districts appoint someone to fill out the term when they don't "represent" that district.

There are a lot of other good comments in the old post about how the mayor would be chosen/elected, etc.  This has the feeling of a "goat rodeo" in the making.  Here's an old favorite 2013 election photo to ponder along with the goats.

Office Growth Drives Housing Demand, Duh.

It's generally fun to poke fun at EssEff politics, but this Election Day brought a rare instance of sanity out of EssEff voters.  As the Chronicle reported

Also winning was Proposition E, which will limit the amount of office space San Francisco can allow each year if the city fails to build enough affordable housing, based on targets set by the state.  The measure, which needed a simple majority to pass, was leading 54.54% to 45.46% — 130,736 to 108,983.

Prop. E was sponsored chiefly by Todco, an organization that operates and advocates for affordable housing in San Francisco, and its executive director, John Elberling.  Jon Jacobo, Todco’s policy director, said in a statement that voters “have shifted the paradigm of San Francisco. They have declared that we prioritize affordable housing before office development, and that is now the new norm in San Francisco.”

This move won't be a panacea nor will its impact be felt immediately.  In fact, a number of other crosswinds like the macro-economy, availability of leading edge skills, and the perception of quality of life in the Bay Area will all drive the influx or exodus of people.  Over the course of the last 20 years of my professional career I hired, or attempted to hire, dozens of professionals and admin staff into the Bay Area.  It's always been expensive and attractive, but re-balancing the availability of commercial space with residential space should help just a bit with the cost.  One wonders why it took a Proposition to do this in SF and why it isn't happening in other hotbeds like Mountain View or RWC instead of the futile rent control measures?

"A Man's Got to Know His Limitations"

This quote from Dirty Harry in Magnum Force can be applied to all sorts of things and it's generally very good advice.  I don't know Mountain View city councilman John McAlister, but I'd really like to meet him, shake his hand and see if he ever thought of moving to Burlingame.  This piece from the Daily Post is brilliant.

Electric Parking: Low Usage at Lot Y Spaces

Some of the comments on the original post about taking 10 regular parking spaces in Lot Y just south of B'way and creating 8 electric vehicle-only charging spaces noted low occupancy (often no occupancy) of these new spaces.  I've noticed the occasional EV getting juice there, but not too often--and only once have I seen three EVs at the same time.  That motivated me to get the early usage figures from the City and the vendor, EVgo, so we can establish some sort of baseline.  I fully understand that some innovations take time to get to widespread use--the question is how long, if ever?  So here are the January 2020 figures (i.e. 31 days):

312 Charging Sessions

5.2 Megawatt Hours of charging delivered

Equates to ~1,350 miles of electric driving

Doing the math:  10 charges per day for 8 spaces is our baseline…1.25 charges per space per day.  Again, these things can take time, but I sure hope things improve otherwise we should turn at least a couple spots into EV-optional access until usage ramps up.

Banning Natural Gas in B'game

With several study sessions under their belts, the City Council is moving towards a ban on natural gas for new developments in town.  We first heard this out of Berkeley and discussed it last July here.  As the idea moves closer to home (the Daily Journal wrote it up here), I have some thoughts that I have just shared with the council via email.  Here is my letter

Dear Councilmembers,

I am intrigued by the discussions regarding banning natural gas hook-ups in future Burlingame developments including commercial, multi-family and single-family residences.  It strikes me that perhaps the councilmembers who support such a ban should lead the way in this change.  I suggest that each councilmember take the initiative to change out the gas appliances in their own homes first.  The community should be provided insights into both the capital and operating costs of this change.

It would be enlightening to understand the relative costs of electric furnaces, water heaters and high-end electric stoves and fireplaces that meld with typical Burlingame design aesthetics.  Similarly, if any councilmember has a pool or outdoor hot tub, it would be good to understand the options available to heat these amenities.  I can foresee some potential changes and additions to our existing building codes that might be revealed by councilmembers’ changeover projects.  Understanding these changes first would save residents and developers time and money as well as bringing our building inspectors up to speed.  The need for 220V power in many more home locations as well as the need for battery back-up and potentially back-up generators (with appropriate fuels if available) should be examined and shared with the community.  In my nearly 30 years living in Burlingame, I cannot recall a single natural gas outage, but electrical outages are frequent and not likely to improve in the mid-term future.

Lastly, we should all be provided with actual operating cost comparisons for the newly refurbished homes.  If these changeovers could be finished by next winter, a six-month cost comparison for the colder months of October to March would be ideal for assessing the true impact on Burlingame residents.

I look forward to the Council’s leadership on this important issue.

Sincerely,

Joe Baylock

------------------------------------

I'll let you know what I receive in the way of responses. 

  

Ben Franklin: Colonial Blogger

I am thoroughly enjoying Ben Franklin: An American Life by Walter Isaacson that was published in 2003.  I enjoy biographies and autobiographies in general, but this one is so well-researched and well-footnoted that it puts what we all learned in high school U.S. history to shame.  During his life, Franklin referred to himself as a printer.  That vastly understates his talents as a pamphleteer and editor of his own newspaper.  One of the themes of the book is Franklin’s use of anonymous essays to make his points.  Here at the Voice we have occasional flare-ups about not requiring commenters to use their real names, but Franklin set the precedent for American journalism by publishing as Homespun, Pacificus Secundus, Busy-Body, Silence Dogood and Alice Addertongue among many, many other names.  On page 227 of Isaacson’s book he notes

As has been frequently noted, Franklin often wrote anonymously or using a pseudonym.  Sometimes, he was trying to to be truly anonymous; at other times, he was wearing only a thin mask.  This practice was not unusual, indeed it was quite common, among writers of the eighteenth century, including such Franklin heroes as Addison, Steele, and Defoe.  “Scarce one part in ten of the valuable books which are published are with the author’s name,” Addison once declared, with a bit of exaggeration.  At the time, writing anonymously was considered cleverer, less vulgar, and less likely to lead to libel or sedition charges.  Gentlemen sometimes thought it was beneath their stature to have their names on pamphlets and press pieces.  The practice also assured that dissenting political and religious writings were rebutted on their merits rather than by personal attacks.

I find Old Ben’s thinking on this quite sound.  I’m sometimes asked why the Voice doesn’t require registration, real names and verification.  There is the answer from 260 years ago.  I highly recommend the book and expect to be taking on other Franklin thoughts relevant to very current issues in the coming weeks and months.

School Bonds...And Then There Were 3

For the first time in more than 20+ years, I've been contemplating whether or not to support a B'game school bond measure (Measure O) and the SMUSHD Measure L.  Over the last 20+ years it's been a no-brainer to vote "yes" and to further support the schools with donations and charity auction donations and bids.  Parcel taxes and bonds for the local schools are the most local taxation we have and local is good.  In reading the full text of Measure O, my concern was the last bullet point on the Project List 

Workforce housing to increase accessibility for District employees to quality, affordable housing

I decided to check in with Superintendent Maggie MacIsaac about any housing plans and she brought Board member Davina Drabkin into the conversation.  Davina and I had a good conversation about the pressures the district is feeling to retain staff including credentialed staff in key areas like math.  Here are a couple things that came out of that discussion

• There is no pre-allocated portion of the $97 million for housing.
• There are a number of models being tried elsewhere (subsidies, partners, build to suit, etc)
• The Board included the language in order to be able to spend money on studying the issue
• Unlike some Districts, B'game doesn't have land available for any sort of build project and is unlikely to be able to buy it

As a former analyst, I also want to look at the metrics that might point to the severity of the problem, so Maggie was kind enough to provide the teacher turnover (not counting retirements which don't fit the problem) over the last 12 years which are

• Year        % Certified Staff Turnover
• 2007/2008             8.7%
• 08/09                    4.4
• 09/10                    10.6
• 10/11                    9.8
• 11/12                    7.6
• 12/13                    14.4
• 13/14                    12.2
• 14/15                    15.1
• 15/16                    13.8
• 16/17                    16.6
• 17/18                    12.25
• 18/19                    13.3   

There are a lot of factors that go into teacher turnover, but you can say there is a slight upward trend to the data.  There are also a number of non-District-driven projects that might address the housing issue-- the city project on Lots F&N, the stunning amount of building going on it town with affordable unit components, and the possibilities of additional teacher compensation that might not involve millions of dollars of debt.  Of course, the stunning amount of building will only exacerbate the school budget problem. The real challenge for Measure O and L is that a state Proposition, crazily listed as 13 that I'll just call the New Prop. 13, is also on the ballot for $15 billion.  As the Chronicle reported today

The largest school bond in state history, at $15 billion, is going to voters in March as supporters try to put a dent in a $100 billion backlog of failing boiler rooms, leaky roofs and new construction projects needed at K-12 schools and universities.

Proposition 13 — unrelated to the same-numbered 1978 tax measure — was placed on the ballot by the Legislature with bipartisan support.

Supporters, which include the education establishment as well as the construction industry, would allocate $9 billion to K-12 schools, $4 billion for California’s public universities and $2 billion for community colleges.

The prospect of voter fatigue is very real-- I am hearing it all over town.  So I'm still contemplating how I will vote, but I feel a little better having some information that I didn't have before.  Hopefully you are too.