« Apple Store Reopens | Main | Fall Colors 2017 »

November 22, 2017

Comments

Oski

I Think the Berkeley study you're referring to is here?

http://its.berkeley.edu/btl/2010/spring/HRS-life-cycle

Main points being the amount of concrete its going to take to construct and where we get our energy from.

No matter what it will take a significant amount of concrete to construct any sort of infrastructure, including widening of our freeways.

The other point relies heavily on what sources we receive our energy from, which will continually be moving towards greener and less environmentally negative production means.

"At mid-level occupancy HSR ROI is achieved at 28 years for energy and 71 years for GHG emissions."

Let me know if I missed something, but I don't think its fair to spread misinformation.

Joe

Instead of making uninformed accusations ("misinformation") try reading backwards in the HSR category found at the right frame. You will soon stumble into this post:

http://www.burlingamevoice.com/2017/05/high-cost-rail-part-133-environmental-hypocrisy.html#comments

That will link to the full article.

I haven't heard anyone suggesting widening I-5 if High-cost rail is not built.

We shall see about "moving towards greener energy". You can read back in the Power section on the right for more information there that might enlighten you--yes, pun intended. Go check out the German cost per kilowatt-hour. It ain't pretty.

http://www.burlingamevoice.com/2017/06/clean-power-or-reliable-power.html#comments

Phinancier

Dear Oski, if this thing ever does get finished Elon Musk or Richard Branson or Sergey Brin will make it look like a Model T well before 28 years after completion.

BUT, the chances of it ever running are less than 20% so EVERY little bit of CO2, concrete and steel we have paid for already is likely to be WASTED, dude.

resident

Even mid-level occupancy is a friggin' pipe dream. They are talking a train every 10 minutes or somthing stupid like that.

Laura

Plus if it ever makes it to the Bay Area, it means taking commuter trains off the tracks for those trains running every ten minutes. That means more people having to get in their cars as less trains to get them up and down the Peninsula.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

About the Voice

  • The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community. Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California. On it you can read and comment on important city issues.

    Note: Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice Blog are those of the poster and not necessarily the opinion of the editorial board of the Burlingame Voice. See Terms of Use

Contributing to the Voice

  • If you would like more information on the Burlingame Voice, send an email to editor@burlingamevoice.com with your request or question. We appreciate your interest.

    Authors may login here.

    For help posting to the Voice, see our tutorial.