« More Dining Options - Fluc it! | Main | Kohl Mansion - Our Latest 100 year Gem »

February 03, 2014

Comments

Anne

Ann K. and Nirmala spent the same amount but Ann got almost exactly twice the votes. There's a message in there somewhere for someone.

Been here forever

The real question is why should an incumbent have to spend so much money? And secondly, one would hope that an incumbent would get twice the votes of one running on the coat tails of Terry Nagel, even though neither got my vote. Brownrigg spent little and did just fine as an incumbent seeking reelection. Keighran and Nagel should both look for something else with which to occupy their time.

Joe

Too bad Kevin Mullin couldn't just look at his own neighborhood for inspiration! From the DJ

The state of California would foot the bill for future election recounts triggered by close races under proposed legislation introduced Thursday by Assemblyman Kevin Mullin, D-South San Francisco.

The Peninsula lawmaker announced plans for such a law during the legislative recess and followed through yesterday by gutting an existing Senate bill. The proposed bill would require a state-funded recount when the difference between second and third place is one-tenth of 1 percent.

Mullin saw the need for change after state controller candidate John Perez, a termed-out Los Angeles assemblyman, sparked a recount in the June primary results. The race highlighted issues that are long due for fixing, according to Mullin.

http://www.smdailyjournal.com/articles/lnews/2014-08-08/election-recount-bill-introduced-california-would-fund-tally-triggered-by-close-races/1776425128060.html

Joe

Here's an interesting tidbit from the SacBee:

Even as voting by mail becomes increasingly common in California elections, more mail ballots are not being counted, according to a study of mail voting in three counties, including Sacramento.

The report, released Tuesday by the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation, found that 0.8 percent of the mail ballots cast in four elections in Orange, Santa Cruz and Sacramento counties were never counted. Sixty-one percent of them arrived after Election Day. Twenty percent of the ballots had not been signed, and in 18 percent of the cases, election officials concluded that the signature on the ballot did not match the voter’s signature the office had on file.

Kim Alexander, the voter foundation’s president and the main author of the report, said she she is confident that its findings also apply to the state’s 55 other counties.

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2014/08/20/6640343/late-arrival-missing-signatures.html#storylink=cpy

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

About the Voice

  • The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community. Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California. On it you can read and comment on important city issues.

    Note: Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice Blog are those of the poster and not necessarily the opinion of the editorial board of the Burlingame Voice. See Terms of Use

Contributing to the Voice

  • If you would like to create new items on the Burlingame Voice, send an email to editor@burlingamevoice.com and tell us a little about yourself. We may set you up as an author on the blog.

    Authors may login here.

    For help posting to the Voice, see our tutorial.