« Bridging the Bay | Main | B'way Grade Study - Sneaking in High Cost Rail? »

September 05, 2013

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e553e178e98834019aff355ac8970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pining for D. Pine:

Comments

Joe

The SM County Times has a useful piece on the redistricting here:

http://www.mercurynews.com/san-mateo-county-news/ci_24092659/deadline-approaches-san-mateo-county-redistricting-maps#insidebayarea

I haven't had a chance to go to the mapping site to draw my preferred version, but we have until Friday. That site is here:

www.smcdistrictlines.org.

Joe

The Daily Journal if focused on "slivers" of area or towns while the big issue is the gerrymandering of B'game.

http://www.smdailyjournal.com/articles/lnews/2013-10-08/supervisors-ready-to-redraw-district-lines/1776425111278.html

Joe

Looks like B'game dodged a bullet on the redistricting:

Supervisors Approve New District Boundaries
REDWOOD CITY, Calif. – The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously today to adopt new boundaries for the County’s five supervisorial districts.

“The map we selected takes into account the public input we received from every corner of San Mateo County,” said Don Horsley, president of the Board of Supervisors. “We heard from many interests and we are pleased that we were able to select a map that limited the number of cities that would be divided while at the same time uniting communities.”

Following a public hearing, the Board voted to introduce an ordinance adopting the map “Community Unity B” as the official district boundaries. The vote followed an extensive months-long public outreach process that included a citizen’s advisory committee. Prior to the Board’s October 8th meeting, the advisory committee recommended the Board consider maps called “Community Unity” and “Equity,” which were both supported by members of the public.

The Board ultimately blended the two maps, adopting the recommendations of the “Equity” coalition in the North County and the “Community Unity” coalition in the South County. The approved map also attempts to minimize city divisions while keeping communities of interest like the coast together in a single district.

The adopted map divides four cities between districts: Belmont (Districts 2 and 3), Menlo Park (Districts 3 and 4), San Bruno (Districts 1 and 5) and South San Francisco (Districts 1 and 5). Belmont, South San Francisco and Redwood City were divided between districts in the existing map. The new map unifies Redwood City, which under the previous map had the Redwood Shores area in a separate district.

Key provisions of the adopted map:

District 1: 147,020 residents
Millbrae, Burlingame, Hillsborough and the unincorporated San Mateo Highlands along with 71.9 percent of South San Francisco (mostly east of Junipero Sera Boulevard) and 74.6 percent of San Bruno (south of Sneath Lane and west of Interstate 280).


I recall seeing a meeting notice for Thursday night at the San Mateo library with Warren Slocum and Claire Mack talking about the impact of this decision.

jennifer

So, I've read both articles, and I still don't understand what this means for Burlingame. Can somebody spell in out in a sentence or two?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

About the Voice

  • The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community. Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California. On it you can read and comment on important city issues.

    Note: Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice Blog are those of the poster and not necessarily the opinion of the editorial board of the Burlingame Voice. See Terms of Use